Skip to main content

NSW Selection Bias: In reply to Snooker

I was set the challenge to find some statistical evidence of NSW bias in the selection of Australian Test cricketers. I can’t seem to find a state-by-state breakdown of Test players, and couldn’t be arsed going through every one, so I’ve had to find a different way to establish it.

I decided to have a look at state players who have amassed significant figures at the first class level, but did not get much of a run at the higher level, and see how players from NSW compared with players from elsewhere. I’m not claiming that each of these players SHOULD have got a greater run in tests, merely comparing how much of a go high run-scorers and wicket-takers have received in test cricket.

Personally, I found the results surprising, and believe that they tend to support some sort of institutional bias towards NSW representatives. Even considering the factor of being the largest state with the most cricketers, I think that the statistical breakdown establishes a pretty convincing argument that playing for NSW helps your selection chances, or perhaps that NOT playing for NSW hurts your ability to get a sustained run in the senior squad.

Here are the figures:

State; Players with 4000+ runs; (4000+ runs, 8 or fewer tests); % missed out
NSW = 29 (2); 6.9%
QLD = 18 (9); 50%
SA = 28 (14); 50%
TAS = 10 (8); 80%
VIC = 24 (9); 37.5%
WA = 20 (10); 50%

State; Players with 160+ wickets; (160+ wickets, 8 or fewer tests); % missed out
NSW = 23 (5); 21.7%
QLD = 19 (12); 61.2%
SA = 17 (6); 35.3%
TAS = 5 (4); 80%
VIC = 24 (8); 33.3%
WA = 16 (12); 75%

Thus, the percentage of batsmen from NSW who have scored over 4000 first class runs who played 8 tests or fewer equals 6.9%. The percentage of all other state players is 50%. Tasmanians, and then Queenslanders, South Australians and Western Australians have received far lower international reps.

The percentage of bowlers from NSW who have taken 160 or more first class wickets and played 8 tests or fewer is 21.7%. The percentage of all other state players is 51.6%. Tasmanians, Western Australians and Queenslanders have traditionally received the worst deals.

Here are the players concerned:

4000+ runs AND 160+ wickets with 8 or fewer tests [5]:
Graeme Watson; Tom Moody; Ian Brayshaw; Shaun Young; Trevor Hohns.

4000+ runs AND 160+ wickets with 8 or fewer tests for NSW [0]: NONE

4000+ runs and 8 or fewer tests [42] (not including above):
Mike Valetta; John Inverarity; Ryan Campbell; Wayne Andrews; Greg Shipperd; Murray Vernon; Ken Meuleman; Brad Hodge; Dav Whatmore; Jack Potter; Paul Hibbert; Keith Rigg; Darren Berry; Simon O'Donnell; Mick Taylor; Jamie Cox; Michael Di Venuto; Dene Hills; Daniel Marsh; Danny Buckingham; Roger Woolley; Jamie Siddons; Neil Dansie; Glenn Bishop; Phil Ridings; Ken Cunningham; Paul Nobes; Ashley Woodcock; Ron Hamence; David Fitzgerald; James Brayshaw; John Lill; Ben Johnson; Jack Badcock; Stuart Law; Sam Trimble; Martin Love; Jimmy Maher; Trevor Barsby; Robbie Kerr; Phil Carlson; Cecil Thompson.

4000+ runs, 8 or fewer tests, minor career for NSW [3]: [6.25%]
Jason Arnberger [NSW =1139/Vic = 4190]; Rod Tucker [NSW = 105/Tas = 4971]; Colin Pinch [NSW = 116/SA = 4090].

4000+ runs for NSW, 8 or fewer tests [2]: [4.16%]
Dirk Wellham [NSW = 4297/TAS = 1629/QLD = 2736]; Steve Small [NSW = 4610/Tas = 397]

160+ wickets, 8 or fewer tests [35] (not including above):
Dirk Tazelaar; Joe Dawes; Ron Oxenham; Adam Dale; Peter Allan; Len Johnson; John Maguire; Mick Raymer; Ross Duncan; Malcolm Francke; Paul Jackson; Peter McIntyre; Geff Noblet; Geoffrey Attenborough; Frank Ward; Mark Harrity; Jack Wilson; Damien Wright; Mark Ridgway; Chris Matthews; Mathew Inness; Ian Harvey; David Saker; Alan Thomson; Ian Callen; Mick Lewis; Don Blackie; Jack Hill; Jo Angel; Brendon Julian; Ken MacLeay; Tony Mann; Des Hoare; Mick Malone; Ron Gaunt; Bob Massie.

160+ wickets, 8 or fewer tests, minor career for NSW [1]:
Matthew Nicholson [NSW = 86/WA = 142].

160+ wickets for NSW, 8 or fewer tests [5]: [11.62%]
Johnny Martin [NSW = 293/SA = 135]; David Colley; Wayne Holdsworth; Tom McKibbin; Alan Walker.

Comments

Barry Freelove said…
"Cracker" Holdsworth was stiff.
Kris McCracken said…
If 'Cracker' was given the run of BLee, he'd have taken, oh, 20 or 30 wickets!
Just a couple of points - Simon O'Donnell no-one liked off the pitch, so he was done for. Mick Taylor played one one day match ... which he's unlikely to forget ... though he protested that he "hadn't been throwing pies". Never mind, he still has a world record ie most expensive figures ever ... !
Kris McCracken said…
Simon O'Donnell loves himself enough that even if everyone hates him, he's still loved!

Popular posts from this blog

Hold me now, oh hold me now, until this hour has gone around. And I'm gone on the rising tide, to face Van Dieman's Land

Theme Thursday again, and this one is rather easy. I am Tasmanian, you see, and aside from being all around general geniuses - as I have amply described previously - we are also very familiar with the concept of WATER. Tasmania is the ONLY island state of an ISLAND continent. That means, we're surrounded by WATER. That should help explain why I take so many photographs of water . Tasmania was for a long time the place where the British (an island race terrified of water) sent their poor people most vile and horrid criminals. The sort of folk who would face the stark choice of a death sentence , or transportation to the other end of the world. Their catalogue of crimes is horrifying : stealing bread assault stealing gentlemen's handkerchiefs drunken assault being poor affray ladies being overly friendly with gentlemen for money hitting people having a drink and a laugh public drunkenness being Irish Fenian terrorist activities being Catholic religious subversion. ...

But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.

Can you believe that it is time for Theme Thursday already? Today we are not talking chocolate , toddlers , mess or ignominy . No, today we're dealing with ANIMAL . Now I could have posted a picture of a possum, numbat, wombat, wallaby or any other furry killing machine that roams our fair isle, but I figure that I'd use a far more deadly creature as an example of an animal . Some people - I know them as fools - have chosen to embrace that highfalutin idea that human beans are for some ungodly reason superior to animals. Of course, what these imbeciles seem to forget is that were are simple animals ourselves ! Anyone with a baby, toddler, teenage boy or Queenslander in their household could tell you this. Look at Henry [above]. One chocolate frog in the back of the car on a sunny day and all of a sudden it's Elagabalus meets Bacchus for a quick shandy in the Serengeti and we're down on all fours carrying on like a cat in heat. Fair dinkum, anyone who chooses to ...

Something unpleasant is coming when men are anxious to tell the truth.

This is the moon. Have I mentioned how much I adore the zoom on my camera? It's Theme Thursday you see, and after last week's limp effort, I have been thinking about how I might redeem myself. Then I clicked on the topic and discover that it was BUTTON. We've been hearing a lot about the moon in the past couple of weeks. Apparently some fellas went up there and played golf and what-not forty-odd years ago. The desire to get to the moon, however, was not simply about enhancing opportunities for Meg and Mog titles and skirting local planning by-laws in the construction of new and innovative golf courses. No, all of your Sputniks , "One small steps" and freeze dried ice cream was about one thing , and one thing only : MAD Now, I don't mean mad in terms of "bloke breaks record for number of scorpions he can get up his bum", no I mean MAD as in Mutual assured destruction . When I was a young man you see, there was a lot of talk about the type of m...