Skip to main content

Ads that I like disturb me very much #67


I am kind of lost for words when it comes to today's ad. The kindest thing that I can say is that they image and tagline combination seems somewhat poorly chosen. I know that society is used to the sexualisation of wee bairns in this heady age of Bratz, Brittany and bellbottom trousers [look, I've had a long day, all right, and alliteration sells papers].

Yet the notion of childlike innocence as a signifier for getting one's horn on, as advanced in the obviously liberal 1970s is off-putting to those of us with [warning: universal moral judgement coming up] healthy regard for what is or is not sexy.

[Note: the one thing that amused me most about this ad, was the resemblence in make up with some of Bill Henson's models, you know, the ones that were in no way meant to be 'sexy'...]
Labels:

Comments

Jules said…
I agree it is appalling to put the word sex, and baby/child in the same sentence. Put simply children aren't sexy they are bloody children!!!!
29 November 2008 at 16:36
magiceye said…
atrocious!!

It is peace in Mumbai at last.
Thank you for all your prayers and good wishes.
Pray for all those who lost their lives and may God give strength to their near and dear ones to bear their irreparable loss.
29 November 2008 at 18:15
USelaine said…
I remember that ad. When you're a teenage girl, you already know you're the target of leering deceivers, and an ad like this just confirmed that reality. I think the model was older than she may look here, and was seen in more typical fashion ads as well. How do you like those phallic product packages?
29 November 2008 at 19:11
Diederick Wijmans said…
I agree with you. It is appalling that both the one who actually made this ad, as well as the company that uses it, had nothing against combining sex with the image of this baby girl. In these cases I am toally in favour of censorship.
Ciao
Diederick
29 November 2008 at 19:37
Kris McCracken said…
Jules, it is an odd message to be sending, that’s for sure.

Magiceye, let’s hope that it lasts.

USelaine, it’s hard to see how you’re doing anything with this ad other than legitimising some pretty dodgy behaviour.

Phallologcentrism, it’s the bane of human society!

Diederick, I don’t think that something this blatant would be allowed in Australia these days. That said, every day we are bombarded by images that sexualise children in both subtle and unsubtle ways (e.g. Bratz dolls, some of the kids TV shows etc).
1 December 2008 at 11:09
Z said…
Yikes! Yikes! Yikes!
1 December 2008 at 20:36
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hold me now, oh hold me now, until this hour has gone around. And I'm gone on the rising tide, to face Van Dieman's Land

Theme Thursday again, and this one is rather easy. I am Tasmanian, you see, and aside from being all around general geniuses - as I have amply described previously - we are also very familiar with the concept of WATER. Tasmania is the ONLY island state of an ISLAND continent. That means, we're surrounded by WATER. That should help explain why I take so many photographs of water . Tasmania was for a long time the place where the British (an island race terrified of water) sent their poor people most vile and horrid criminals. The sort of folk who would face the stark choice of a death sentence , or transportation to the other end of the world. Their catalogue of crimes is horrifying : stealing bread assault stealing gentlemen's handkerchiefs drunken assault being poor affray ladies being overly friendly with gentlemen for money hitting people having a drink and a laugh public drunkenness being Irish Fenian terrorist activities being Catholic religious subversion. ...
62 comments
Read more

Something unpleasant is coming when men are anxious to tell the truth.

This is the moon. Have I mentioned how much I adore the zoom on my camera? It's Theme Thursday you see, and after last week's limp effort, I have been thinking about how I might redeem myself. Then I clicked on the topic and discover that it was BUTTON. We've been hearing a lot about the moon in the past couple of weeks. Apparently some fellas went up there and played golf and what-not forty-odd years ago. The desire to get to the moon, however, was not simply about enhancing opportunities for Meg and Mog titles and skirting local planning by-laws in the construction of new and innovative golf courses. No, all of your Sputniks , "One small steps" and freeze dried ice cream was about one thing , and one thing only : MAD Now, I don't mean mad in terms of "bloke breaks record for number of scorpions he can get up his bum", no I mean MAD as in Mutual assured destruction . When I was a young man you see, there was a lot of talk about the type of m...
50 comments
Read more

But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.

Can you believe that it is time for Theme Thursday already? Today we are not talking chocolate , toddlers , mess or ignominy . No, today we're dealing with ANIMAL . Now I could have posted a picture of a possum, numbat, wombat, wallaby or any other furry killing machine that roams our fair isle, but I figure that I'd use a far more deadly creature as an example of an animal . Some people - I know them as fools - have chosen to embrace that highfalutin idea that human beans are for some ungodly reason superior to animals. Of course, what these imbeciles seem to forget is that were are simple animals ourselves ! Anyone with a baby, toddler, teenage boy or Queenslander in their household could tell you this. Look at Henry [above]. One chocolate frog in the back of the car on a sunny day and all of a sudden it's Elagabalus meets Bacchus for a quick shandy in the Serengeti and we're down on all fours carrying on like a cat in heat. Fair dinkum, anyone who chooses to ...
42 comments
Read more