You know, that might be the answer - to act boastfully about something we ought to be ashamed of. That's a trick that never seems to fail.
So here is the sky this morning, at about 7:45 am. Some interesting cloud formations going on, and if there are any meteorologists out there that can explain to me why you get these ‘cotton ball’ clouds, I’d be most appreciative.
I don’t watch a lot of TV. I do stick it on for the morning news headlines though, so even with my limited exposure I haven’t been able to miss the almost-pornographic orgy of grief that appears to have overtaken Australian television screens over the past few days.
I’m all for covering important stories, and I understand that capturing the ‘human element’ is important when endeavouring to understand the magnitude of an event like this, but there is a point that aiding comprehension becomes gratuitous exploitation of other people’s misery.
This morning the TV crews appeared to have run out of locals to goad into crying for the camera, and had resorted to the old standard of “one branch of the media talks to another branch of the media about the locals”. In the twenty minutes before I left, they’d had a photographer, cartoonist and radio personality all talking about the Aussie spirit, mateship, and Aussie bush mateship spirit. Oh, they also got to showcase each of their wares too. So at least somebody wins.
I’ll cop that ahead of some of the questions posed to victims of the bushfires though. Again, with limited exposure, I’ve seen at least five times an old chestnut wheeled out, the one where some young, attractive waif shoves a microphone under the nose of a tired, blackened local and reels off the usual list:
“So you’ve lost your wife, your children, your parents, your home, your possessions, your dog and your cat...
How does it feel?
HOW DOES IT FEEL?
I would imagine that it doesn’t feel very good, actually.
I’m quite surprised that I haven’t yet seen a tired, hungry and angry interviewee deliver a mouthful. If they do, it will be quite deserved.
So the TV continues. All the channels.
Yesterday morning, after an interview in which a woman described the final time that she spoke to her husband of 48 years – they fought, she called him an idiot for wanting to stay and protect their house and stormed off – she broke down. After a couple of minutes of uncontrollable sobbing, snot, tears and dribble (raw grief can get that way), the host tried to get her arm around the poor woman without soiling her blouse and they called it quits.
So they cut to the other host, and with the most sombre face that he could manage (he looked constipated), he observed: “it is quite difficult to watch, isn’t it?”
Obviously it is not as difficult to film and broadcast the whole ordeal, I guess.
Comments
Reminds of the story about the Beaconsfield miners. They finally had them out, escorted them to an ambulance, and as they're about to close the doors, unnamedmorningnewsshowhost jumps in the back of the ambulance & offers them his business card.
Ahem.
So, to the clouds: Possibly this?
I swear and declare I am totally sympathetic and heartbroken to what has occurred but I feel completely overloaded with the crap they are forcing us to listen to and watch.
I think it is so disrespectful to the events that have befallen these towns and their people.
i guess good journalism makes us feel something but this time especially i think the plot has been lost. what is there to gain by splashing these people's private agony all over our TVs?
surely we can feel without totally humiliating folks
great post, kris
The best bit was when one of the miners described Koch as “a wanker” to the other channel.
Thanks for the heads up on the clouds. That site is well worth a wander around.
Time for another round of Elmo’s World!