Skip to main content

Collapse in Kingston!

Kingston, Jamaica. Australia looked in the box seat but have had a little collapse late on to be four wickets down for just 17 runs. They still lead by 136 runs, but the four guys out are all batsmen, including Hussey and Ponting.

Now, I'm not one of these guys who has jumped on the "I hate Australia because they are so arrogant" bandwagon. However, I want the Windies to win. I have decided to run through today's team to try and figure out what the reason may be.

Jaques: Can't even spell his own name correctly. New South Welshman, which means he has had a 'smooth selection' into test cricket. Looks unfit, and he's a rubbish fielder. Let's just say I haven't warmed to him...

Katich: How many chances does one bloke get? And isn't it funny that it has taken a move to New South Wales to get all of these chances?

Ponting: He is originally from Tassie, but has lived in New South Wales for years now. Consider that a black mark against his name.

Hussey: I like him. Waited around for years until he got a run. Should have moved somewhere else, that may have helped.

Hodge: I don't like him, but he has had a rough run with selection. How they persevered with M. Clarke and Katich while he wasn't given a run is beyond me (actually, that's not true, we all know why).

Symonds: He seems a nice enough fellow off the field, but has an awful sense of style. Consider me on the fence.

Haddin: Meh. New South Welshman. I like Ronche.

Johnson: Would have chosen Noffke myself.

Clark: New South Welshman. Seems a nice chap.

BLee: New South Welshman. This may explain getting picked consistently for 7 years without producing. He's come good, but if you wait around at the bust stop that long, it'll eventually arrive.

MacGill: New South Welshman. I am sure that this contributes to the fact that I have honestly never disliked a cricketer more than S.C.G. MacGill*. It's rare to see such a pretentious, posing, odious little thug in the game of cricket. Look at his two wickets today, Morton and Chanderpaul. Rubbish balls that batsmen get too excited about and get caught slogging, I'm sure that there is an art in it, but forgive me for longing for good balls getting wickets.

[* I tell a lie actually, I didn't like Hansie Cronje from the moment I saw him.]

Looking over that, the reason is obvious. I want the Windies to win because (if you include Ponting) seven of the eleven are from New South Wales. I can't be seen supporting that sort of carry on!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi there, firstly I like your style, but it would be nice if before any comments on a person you knew the truth before doing so... this is in respect to the comment made of Phil Jaques; your comments: "Jaques: Can't even spell his own name correctly. New South Welshman, which means he has had a 'smooth selection' into test cricket. Looks unfit, and he's a rubbish fielder. Let's just say I haven't warmed to him..." Phil Jaques , I am not sure about the first comment spelling his own name.. please enlighten us on this...???? In regards to unfit, the guy gets up EVERY morning runs 8kms to the Gym, works out for almost 2 hours with a personal trainer and then runs back 8kms... unfit, what do you do??? Feilding, well you got us there, however there is a god reason, Phil Jaques (did I spell that properly?) has been putting up for years with some not quite 100% contacts as he has had eye problems since birth to see the ball coming is a huge thing to do with inadequate sight, However, having said this he just 2 weeks ago had laser surgery and he believes this will help him greatly ! I hope this helps you with future writings and at least warm you a little to my little cousin...

Yours.. Michael Jaques... Yes Spelt correctly!
freefalling said…
Me too!!!
Stuart MacGill!!!
He's got a wine bit in the weekend magazine in The Herald Sun.
Wanker.
Kris McCracken said…
I'll have to tone down on Phil from now on! If it makes you feel any better, Phil and Stuart Clark do come across as the more likable NSW players!

To the responses!

First, I must admit that I have always seen the name 'Jacques' (the French version of the name Jacob, James or Jack, eg Jacques Brel; Jacques Cousteau; Jacques Derrida; Jacques Kallis; Hattie Jacques etc) spelled with a 'c'. I was sort of trying to be funny. No offence to all of the 'c-less' 'Jaques' out there (from a man whose name is 'Kris' not 'Chris').

Second, I never said he was unfit, just that he looked unfit. I'm just comparing him to the svelte Jamie Cox you see, who I'm still bitter never got a run in the test side (part of my bitterness to the NSW players, without doubt)!

Let's hope the laser works, it might make all the difference. I wear contacts myself and would go down that track if I had the dosh!

Now, for me to come around and give Phil a fair go, I want to know one thing: is he a cat or a dog man?
Anonymous said…
A Dog man... and the reason????
Kris McCracken said…
Well, you can learn a lot about a person if you know whether they prefer dogs or cats.
Barry Freelove said…
I warn all contributors that someone may have hacked into the "This will hurt me". I believe the preceding post is not the work if Kris McCracken, but some lunatic who's copped a few too many bouncers (in the era before helmets).
Kris McCracken said…
I know your game Stephen Davis, you won't be happy until the entire eleven are New South Welshmen!
I supported the Windies because I back the underdog and it's about time world cricket had a world-class Windies outfit again (though preferably not as surly or reliant on the short pitched stuff). I also supported NZ. So no surprise that both lost.

Michael J: sense of humour failure pal. Off the topic anyhow, since as we all know fat lads can make great cricketers. I chose the following pie appreciation XI a while ago:

Boon.
Taylor
Cowdrey
Inzy
Gatting
Beefy Botham
Rod Marsh
Pre-2003 Flintoff
Warne
Merve Hughes
Bruce Reid

I'd back 'em against the current Oz XI any day.

Maybe McCraken was using the same type of helmet as Flynn, the Kiwi chap, who lost a tooth on Saturday

Popular posts from this blog

Hold me now, oh hold me now, until this hour has gone around. And I'm gone on the rising tide, to face Van Dieman's Land

Theme Thursday again, and this one is rather easy. I am Tasmanian, you see, and aside from being all around general geniuses - as I have amply described previously - we are also very familiar with the concept of WATER. Tasmania is the ONLY island state of an ISLAND continent. That means, we're surrounded by WATER. That should help explain why I take so many photographs of water . Tasmania was for a long time the place where the British (an island race terrified of water) sent their poor people most vile and horrid criminals. The sort of folk who would face the stark choice of a death sentence , or transportation to the other end of the world. Their catalogue of crimes is horrifying : stealing bread assault stealing gentlemen's handkerchiefs drunken assault being poor affray ladies being overly friendly with gentlemen for money hitting people having a drink and a laugh public drunkenness being Irish Fenian terrorist activities being Catholic religious subversion. ...

Something unpleasant is coming when men are anxious to tell the truth.

This is the moon. Have I mentioned how much I adore the zoom on my camera? It's Theme Thursday you see, and after last week's limp effort, I have been thinking about how I might redeem myself. Then I clicked on the topic and discover that it was BUTTON. We've been hearing a lot about the moon in the past couple of weeks. Apparently some fellas went up there and played golf and what-not forty-odd years ago. The desire to get to the moon, however, was not simply about enhancing opportunities for Meg and Mog titles and skirting local planning by-laws in the construction of new and innovative golf courses. No, all of your Sputniks , "One small steps" and freeze dried ice cream was about one thing , and one thing only : MAD Now, I don't mean mad in terms of "bloke breaks record for number of scorpions he can get up his bum", no I mean MAD as in Mutual assured destruction . When I was a young man you see, there was a lot of talk about the type of m...

But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.

Can you believe that it is time for Theme Thursday already? Today we are not talking chocolate , toddlers , mess or ignominy . No, today we're dealing with ANIMAL . Now I could have posted a picture of a possum, numbat, wombat, wallaby or any other furry killing machine that roams our fair isle, but I figure that I'd use a far more deadly creature as an example of an animal . Some people - I know them as fools - have chosen to embrace that highfalutin idea that human beans are for some ungodly reason superior to animals. Of course, what these imbeciles seem to forget is that were are simple animals ourselves ! Anyone with a baby, toddler, teenage boy or Queenslander in their household could tell you this. Look at Henry [above]. One chocolate frog in the back of the car on a sunny day and all of a sudden it's Elagabalus meets Bacchus for a quick shandy in the Serengeti and we're down on all fours carrying on like a cat in heat. Fair dinkum, anyone who chooses to ...