Skip to main content

“She imagined her life in time lapse, shadows moving in circles away from the sun, the stars scattered like glass from a broken window, flowers wilting..."

 

Never again. Brooke St, Hobart. March 2021.

Kokomo by Victoria Hannan

Since finishing this book, I've held off writing this review to let my thoughts on the novel distil and settle. Alas, I still hate it. I have no problem with flawed characters (I love 'em). Yet, when the entire story revolves around the arc of two people you neither like, believe or understand, we have trouble.

Let's start with the central character of Mina. She comes across as incredibly immature and childlike. I struggled to connect her with the supposed capacities she has in the workplace. I found her immaturity baffling, whether the opening (clumsy) ode to a 'perfect penis' (on a supreme dick), through to her nightlife habits, childish avoidance of conflict or a complete incapacity to connect in-depth with those around her,

I kept waiting for the narrative arc to swing around with some form of revelation or resolution that explained events. [SPOILER] It would make sense that Mina's internalised sense of grief and loss relates to the appalling treatment at the hands of an unstable and selfish (or more generously) unwell mother. This may explain her attraction to toxic jobs, men and friends. No more is this evident than in her sexual encounters. If I believed that the author had painted the degrading and grim encounters as illustrative of broken and unhealthy sexuality rooted in trauma, it wouldn't have troubled me. Yet it seems not, as the ending points to Brendan as a prospective love interest, despite their sexual encounter reading more like an assault than any meaningful and consensual act.

When the story cycles back around to her father's death, I was amazed to learn that she was in her final year at University (aged 20?). I had assumed that she was closer to 12, such is the childlike frailty of her reactions. It would make sense if there were some effort to explore her relationship with her mother and the trauma and toxicity of that relationship. In its absence, she comes across as an idiot.

Which leads me to... Elaine. Crikey, Elaine is an interesting character. Elaine’s story dominates the second half of the book. It reads more like Fatal Attraction than an empathetic study of mental illness and grief. If we were to flip the gender of Elaine, her stalking and lifelong obsession would become a far darker thing rather than a testament to flawed character.

Frankly, the less said about Elaine, the better. She is one of the least sympathetic and most noxious literary figures that I have ever come across. Whether due to illness or character failure, I could not accept the neat little resolution between mother and daughter at the novel's end. "Oh mum! Thirty-five years of deception, stalking, unhealthy obsession, lying to your family and neglect? Oh well, things happen." [END OF SPOILER]

There are other irritations. What was the point of the Shelly character and her husband if it was to go nowhere? Are we meant to accept that Elaine's trauma was due to that small an issue? Given its initial prominence, the author seems ambivalent towards the corrosive effects of social media. How are we supposed to feel about Kira's Instagram? It is a bit rich to give us a monologue right at the end on the injurious effects of facile and shallow culture into the mouths of an Instagram bikini model and a marketing executive. What on Earth are we to make of Valerie? What is her deal?

I'll stop now. I'm giving it one and a half stars because I made it to the end, vaingloriously expecting some kind of outcome that might explain things. While I’d be happy with unresolved trauma and no hope of anything beyond the fucked up muddling through (honestly, these are my favourite endings), we got THAT!?! Heaven help us if this is this is what passes for 'resolution' in the minds of the next generation!

⭐ 1/2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hold me now, oh hold me now, until this hour has gone around. And I'm gone on the rising tide, to face Van Dieman's Land

Theme Thursday again, and this one is rather easy. I am Tasmanian, you see, and aside from being all around general geniuses - as I have amply described previously - we are also very familiar with the concept of WATER. Tasmania is the ONLY island state of an ISLAND continent. That means, we're surrounded by WATER. That should help explain why I take so many photographs of water . Tasmania was for a long time the place where the British (an island race terrified of water) sent their poor people most vile and horrid criminals. The sort of folk who would face the stark choice of a death sentence , or transportation to the other end of the world. Their catalogue of crimes is horrifying : stealing bread assault stealing gentlemen's handkerchiefs drunken assault being poor affray ladies being overly friendly with gentlemen for money hitting people having a drink and a laugh public drunkenness being Irish Fenian terrorist activities being Catholic religious subversion. ...

But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.

Can you believe that it is time for Theme Thursday already? Today we are not talking chocolate , toddlers , mess or ignominy . No, today we're dealing with ANIMAL . Now I could have posted a picture of a possum, numbat, wombat, wallaby or any other furry killing machine that roams our fair isle, but I figure that I'd use a far more deadly creature as an example of an animal . Some people - I know them as fools - have chosen to embrace that highfalutin idea that human beans are for some ungodly reason superior to animals. Of course, what these imbeciles seem to forget is that were are simple animals ourselves ! Anyone with a baby, toddler, teenage boy or Queenslander in their household could tell you this. Look at Henry [above]. One chocolate frog in the back of the car on a sunny day and all of a sudden it's Elagabalus meets Bacchus for a quick shandy in the Serengeti and we're down on all fours carrying on like a cat in heat. Fair dinkum, anyone who chooses to ...

Something unpleasant is coming when men are anxious to tell the truth.

This is the moon. Have I mentioned how much I adore the zoom on my camera? It's Theme Thursday you see, and after last week's limp effort, I have been thinking about how I might redeem myself. Then I clicked on the topic and discover that it was BUTTON. We've been hearing a lot about the moon in the past couple of weeks. Apparently some fellas went up there and played golf and what-not forty-odd years ago. The desire to get to the moon, however, was not simply about enhancing opportunities for Meg and Mog titles and skirting local planning by-laws in the construction of new and innovative golf courses. No, all of your Sputniks , "One small steps" and freeze dried ice cream was about one thing , and one thing only : MAD Now, I don't mean mad in terms of "bloke breaks record for number of scorpions he can get up his bum", no I mean MAD as in Mutual assured destruction . When I was a young man you see, there was a lot of talk about the type of m...