Skip to main content

Why calling out misogyny matters (link)

I posted a few days ago some thoughts that I'd had about the noticeable sexism that can be found in the US Presidential pre-selection process. Without wanted to rehash it, I've been equally parts bemused, angered and depressed by some of my experiences online. Indeed, I've had a number of 'unpleasant' interactions in attempting to flag some of the inappropriate (read: sexist) attacks and assumptions on Clinton, or at least in trying to get people to at least self-identify that maybe some things should be 'out of bounds' in campaigning (like the t-shirt identifying Clinton as a prostitute). Generally speaking though, endeavouring to raise this doesn't seem to be provoking useful and thoughtful debate.

I'd like to think that I tread warily in these matters, and attempt to promote a good discourse rather than go in too heavy handed (at least on someone else’s blog!). But it appears to be to no avail, responses generally start at "Don't be so sensitive" to "fucking retard", "fucking idiot" or (my favourite) "you stupid fucking bitch" (I am a guy, BTW). And these occur in what are supposed to be "progressive" forums. I thought about posting a link to one of the nastier exchanges, but decided against it, because I actually don’t want to generate any sort of bounce in this guy’s traffic.

Anyway, the reason I'm going over it again is that someone forwarded on an interesting exposition on this from can be found on the Feministe website, titled "Why calling out misogyny matters". Anyone interested could well do have a look at what Zuzu has to say. It goes without saying that I agree with her, and would encourage everyone who encounters this sort of crap on line to 'call it out' when you see it, even if the response may well be as predictable as I've found. To me, to say nothing is far worse than to have no (obvious) effect.

Comments

Lake Lady said…
You seem to "get" what's going on here better than most of the people here. And I think you are right on. God save us from ourselves! ;-)
Kris McCracken said…
All that I would like – and the same applies in Australian political discourse – is for people to just show a bit of respect for others, play fair, rise above personality, focus on ideas rather than distractions and (heaven forbid) treat others in ways that brings people together rather than drive them apart. Thinking about how so many ordinary people in Zimbabwe have confronted violent intimidation and an already rigged election yet still turned out and cast their vote in a peaceful and respectful manner, we sort of owe it to them in places where that isn’t a problem to conduct ourselves with a bit of civility and respect, and not demean the process with the nonsense that can so commonly found.

Bloody hell, I’m sounding like Desmond Tutu! (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)
good points, very good. We need to speak up. Sometiems I get weary. I have to keep up the good fight.
Maria Verivaki said…
hi kris - thanks for pointing it out: it's not mimosa, it's acacia - i got the name wrong and have corrected it on the post!
Marcel said…
I listen to NPR (National Public Radio) and I have sexist remarks and some raciest remarks not from NPR but others. But all in all I think we have come a long way from years gone by. However, we do still have a long way to go before we no longer judge people by the color of their skin or the gender.

Thanks for visiting my Sitka Daily Photo Blog.
stromsjo said…
From my vantage point the Clinton camp has given as well as they've taken but I do agree with you that the standard of online discussions in public fora is deteriorating. Same story in Sweden. If you can't take the insults and personal attacks, don't engage in online debate. This all spells bad news for our democracies.
Kris McCracken said…
It does depress me as well that fifty people can engage in an online debate (from all different standpoints), yet all it takes is four or five idiots to shut down discussion and drive everyone else away.

The Guardian forums are a good case in point. You once saw a lot of really vibrant discussion in there, but now it’s all either one-sided vitriol or a few people on polar opposite positions taking pot shots at each other.

Not here though!

Popular posts from this blog

Hold me now, oh hold me now, until this hour has gone around. And I'm gone on the rising tide, to face Van Dieman's Land

Theme Thursday again, and this one is rather easy. I am Tasmanian, you see, and aside from being all around general geniuses - as I have amply described previously - we are also very familiar with the concept of WATER. Tasmania is the ONLY island state of an ISLAND continent. That means, we're surrounded by WATER. That should help explain why I take so many photographs of water . Tasmania was for a long time the place where the British (an island race terrified of water) sent their poor people most vile and horrid criminals. The sort of folk who would face the stark choice of a death sentence , or transportation to the other end of the world. Their catalogue of crimes is horrifying : stealing bread assault stealing gentlemen's handkerchiefs drunken assault being poor affray ladies being overly friendly with gentlemen for money hitting people having a drink and a laugh public drunkenness being Irish Fenian terrorist activities being Catholic religious subversion. ...

Something unpleasant is coming when men are anxious to tell the truth.

This is the moon. Have I mentioned how much I adore the zoom on my camera? It's Theme Thursday you see, and after last week's limp effort, I have been thinking about how I might redeem myself. Then I clicked on the topic and discover that it was BUTTON. We've been hearing a lot about the moon in the past couple of weeks. Apparently some fellas went up there and played golf and what-not forty-odd years ago. The desire to get to the moon, however, was not simply about enhancing opportunities for Meg and Mog titles and skirting local planning by-laws in the construction of new and innovative golf courses. No, all of your Sputniks , "One small steps" and freeze dried ice cream was about one thing , and one thing only : MAD Now, I don't mean mad in terms of "bloke breaks record for number of scorpions he can get up his bum", no I mean MAD as in Mutual assured destruction . When I was a young man you see, there was a lot of talk about the type of m...

But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.

Can you believe that it is time for Theme Thursday already? Today we are not talking chocolate , toddlers , mess or ignominy . No, today we're dealing with ANIMAL . Now I could have posted a picture of a possum, numbat, wombat, wallaby or any other furry killing machine that roams our fair isle, but I figure that I'd use a far more deadly creature as an example of an animal . Some people - I know them as fools - have chosen to embrace that highfalutin idea that human beans are for some ungodly reason superior to animals. Of course, what these imbeciles seem to forget is that were are simple animals ourselves ! Anyone with a baby, toddler, teenage boy or Queenslander in their household could tell you this. Look at Henry [above]. One chocolate frog in the back of the car on a sunny day and all of a sudden it's Elagabalus meets Bacchus for a quick shandy in the Serengeti and we're down on all fours carrying on like a cat in heat. Fair dinkum, anyone who chooses to ...